Minsud Announces Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for the Chinchillones Complex at the Chita Valley Project
TSX-V: MSR
Highlights:
-
Indicated Resources: 188Mt at 0.41% CuEq, 0.25% Cu, 0.11 g/t Au, 10.6 g/t Ag, 36 ppm Mo and 0.16% Zn, containing 776Kt of copper equivalent, 466Kt of copper, 674koz of gold, 63.5Moz of silver, 6.8Kt of molybdenum, and 291Kt of zinc.
-
Inferred Resources: 573Mt at 0.36% CuEq, 0.22% Cu, 0.09 g/t Au, 9.0 g/t Ag, 93 ppm Mo and 0.11% Zn, containing 2,049Kt of copper equivalent, 1,244Kt of copper, 1,650koz of gold, 165.6Moz of silver, 53.2Kt of molybdenum, and 616Kt of zinc.
- The resources are considered suitable for open-pit mining and flotation process, based on Net Smelter Return cutoffs, with copper equivalent calculated post-estimation using the same parameters.
-
Copper, silver, and gold are the primary contributors to the Mineral Resource Estimate, with molybdenum and zinc as secondary contributors.
- Mineralization remains open at depth, with further molybdenum potential identified in unexplored areas.
The maiden Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared by Mr.
Mr.
The deposit is considered potentially economic via open-pit mining and flotation process, demonstrating RPEEE. This conclusion is supported by the spatial continuity of mineralization, the application of NSR cutoffs, and metallurgical performance based on testwork results. Highlighting copper, silver, and gold as primary contributors to economic potential, alongside secondary contributions of molybdenum and zinc.
Three phases of metallurgical testing were conducted on samples from the
- Domain 1, high-grade silver and gold-rich polymetallic intermediate sulfidation (IS).
- Domain 2, high-grade copper and zinc-rich polymetallic
IS . - Domain 3, porphyry-style high-grade copper with or without molybdenum.
- Domain 4, a mix of porphyry and
IS .
Metallurgical studies performed by ALS Metallurgy Kamloops in 2022 and 2024, revealed chalcopyrite and tennantite/enargite as the dominant copper minerals. Results showed significant challenges with arsenic (As) content in concentrates (averaging 7%) as well as elevated zinc levels in certain domains. Distinct metallurgical responses were observed in high zinc geological domains (Domain 2) compared to low zinc geological domains (Domain 1, 3 and 4). The high zinc geological domain exhibited lower copper recoveries and higher zinc concentrate content. The low zinc geological domain had better flotation performance and higher copper recoveries.
Flotation testing demonstrated high copper recoveries (>80%) and pilot plant test work confirmed concentrate grades of ~28% Cu, but with arsenic and zinc above smelter penalty thresholds. Hydrometallurgical studies showed promise for managing deleterious elements while achieving high metal recoveries.
Mineral Resources Estimates are reported on a NSR basis, with three concentrates produced, Cu, Mo and Zn. Due to the complex mineralogy at Chinchillones, standard NSR calculations based on fixed elemental recovery grades were not sufficient to accurately determine concentrate grades for Cu and Zn. Instead, mineralogy-based calculations were employed, assuming hybrid mineral compositions of the dominant minerals to determine concentrate grades for both low and high zinc domains. This approach enabled more precise estimation, with a constant Mo grade applied for the Mo concentrate. Metallurgical recoveries for the low zinc domain are 87% Cu, 40% Au, 65% Ag, and 50% Mo. Metallurgical recoveries for the high zinc domain are 60% Cu, 40% Au, 70% Ag, and 55% Zn. These recovery rates are simplified estimates of recoveries applied to the model and reflect the recovery of potentially economic elements. Detailed recoveries, including those for deleterious elements, have also been factored into the NSR calculation and will be provided in the technical report.
The metal prices applied are as follows: copper at
The Mineral Resource in the low zinc geological domain is reported above a NSR value of
Consistent with CIM Definition Standards (CIM, 2014), the Mineral Resource Estimate has been classified and includes both Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources as summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. This classification reflects the quality of data, spacing of drill holes, and the geological understanding of the deposit. It is reported in compliance with the requirements of the Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101).
Table 1: Chinchillones Mineral Resource Estimate as at
Domain |
Classification |
M Tonnes |
CuEq (%) |
Cu (%) |
Au g/t |
Ag g/t |
Mo (ppm) |
Zn (%) |
Low Zinc |
Indicated |
147 |
0.36 |
0.27 |
0.11 |
8.7 |
46 |
- |
Inferred |
494 |
0.31 |
0.22 |
0.09 |
7.8 |
108 |
- |
|
High Zinc |
Indicated |
41 |
0.61 |
0.18 |
0.13 |
17.6 |
- |
0.72 |
Inferred |
79 |
0.63 |
0.21 |
0.1 |
16.5 |
- |
0.78 |
|
Total |
Indicated |
188 |
0.41 |
0.25 |
0.11 |
10.6 |
36 |
0.16 |
Inferred |
573 |
0.36 |
0.22 |
0.09 |
9.0 |
93 |
0.11 |
Table 2: Chinchillones Mineral Resource Estimate as at
Domain |
Classification |
M Tonnes |
CuEq Metal kt |
Cu Metal kt |
Au k Oz |
Ag M Oz |
Mo Metal kt |
Zn Metal kt |
Low Zinc |
Indicated |
147 |
532 |
392 |
512 |
40.8 |
6.8 |
|
Inferred |
494 |
1,548 |
1,074 |
1,395 |
123.5 |
53.2 |
|
|
High Zinc |
Indicated |
41 |
244 |
74 |
162 |
22.7 |
|
291 |
Inferred |
79 |
501 |
170 |
255 |
42.1 |
|
616 |
|
Total |
Indicated |
188 |
776 |
466 |
674 |
63.5 |
6.8 |
291 |
Inferred |
573 |
2,049 |
1,244 |
1,650 |
165.6 |
53.2 |
616 |
Notes: |
|
(1) Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues. It is noted that no specific issues have been identified as yet. |
(2) The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. |
(3) |
(4) The resource is reported above Net Smelter Return (NSR) cut offs – for the low zinc geological domain |
(5) The metal prices used for the NSR calculation in US$ are |
(6) The copper equivalent (CuEq) grades use the metal prices and recoveries as used for the NSR calculation; for the low zinc domain CuEq_% = Cu_% +(Au_ppm x 0.3095) + (Ag_ppm x 0.0061) + (Mo_ppm x 0.0002). For the high zinc domain, CuEq_% = Cu_% +(Au_ppm x 0.4488) + (Ag_ppm x 0.0095) + (Zn_% x 0.277). Note that Zn is not recovered in the low zinc domain, and Mo is not recovered in the high zinc domain. |
(7) The value contribution of each metal to the project can be derived from the NSR calculation. These are; Cu 67%, Ag 16%, Au 7%, Mo 5% and Zn 5%. |
(8) The figures in the above tables may not add up due to rounding. |
Geological Data
The database for the Chinchillones Mineral Resource Estimate, closed off on
Drill holes to the northwest of the central post-mineralization Dacite are generally oriented southeast, dipping at 70° to 80°, while those to the southeast of the diatreme are drilled northwest, also at 70° to 80°. Well-drilled areas are spaced approximately 80 meters x 80 meters, extending to over 150 meters centers at the deposit's edge.
Lithological and alteration 3D models do not strongly control copper mineralization, as grades vary significantly within and across these domains, making them unsuitable for estimation. To address this, a Cu-As-Ag high-sulfidation envelope was created using a proxy based on Cu, As, Sb, S, and Fe,enabling the identification of high-sulfidation signatures in both drilling and block models. Additional Mo and Zn-Pb grade shell envelopes were also developed. The final estimation domains are combinations of the high-sulfidation and Mo/Zn-Pb grade shells, as defined through statistical similarities and domain boundary analysis.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
All core samples were submitted by MSA for preparation and analysis to the
Qualified Persons and Technical Information
The site visit, including the review of geological aspects such as sampling, drill core, logging, assay laboratory procedures, and independent check samples, was conducted by Mr.
Mr.
The Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared by Mr.
Ms.
The Qualified Persons responsible for the technical report and its various chapters have reviewed and approved the contents of this release.
The full technical report, prepared by Mining Plus in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI-43-101"), will be filed on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) under the Company's issuer profile within 45 days of this news release. The Mineral Resource Estimate is effective as of
About the
About
Minsud is a mineral exploration company focused on exploring its flagship
About South32 Limited
South32 Limited is a globally diversified mining and minerals company. The company's purpose is to make a difference by developing natural resources, improving people's lives now and for generations to come. South32 Limited is trusted by its owners and partners to realise the potential of their resources. South32 Limited produces minerals and metals critical to the world's energy transition from operations across the
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION:
This news release includes certain information that may constitute forward-looking information under applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements about strategic plans, spending commitments, future operations, results of exploration, anticipated financial results, future work programs, capital expenditures and objectives. Forward-looking information is necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information including, but not limited to: fluctuations in the currency markets (such as the Canadian dollar,
Neither the
SOURCE